Fault-finding is often performed in a random and haphazard manner, leading to items being changed for no systematic reason beyond ‘Fred got it working this way last time’. Such an approach may work eventually (when every component has been changed!) but it is hardly the quickest, or cheapest, way of getting a faulty system back into production. In many cases more harm than good results, both with introduction of dirt into the system, and from ill-advised ‘here’s a control adjustment, let’s twiddle it and see if that makes any difference’ approach. There must be a better way.
There are three maintenance levels. First-line maintenance is concerned with getting faulty plant running again. When the cause of a fault is found, first-line staff have the choice of effecting a first-line, on-site, repair (by replacing a failed seal, say) or changing the complete faulty unit for a spare. This decision is based on cost, time, availability of spares, technical ability of staff, the environment on site and company policy.
Second-line maintenance is concerned with repair to complete units changed by first-line maintenance staff. It should be performed in clean and well-equipped workshops. Work is usually well-defined and is often a case of following manufacturers’ manuals.
The final level is simply the return of equipment for repair by the manufacturer. The level at which this is needed is determined by the complexity of equipment, ability of one’s staff, cost and the turn-round time offered by the manufacturer.
Of these three levels, first-line maintenance is hardest as work is ill-defined, pressures from production staff are great and the responsibility high. Unfortunately, it is too often seen as a necessary evil.
Fault-finding is, somewhat simplistically, represented by Figure 9.5. All the evidence on the fault gathered so far is evaluated, and possible causes considered. The simplest test to reduce the number of possibilities is then performed and the cycle repeated until the fault is found.
The final steps in Figure 9.5 are concerned with fault recording and fault analysis. Any shift crew (which performs almost all the first-line repairs) only sees one-quarter of all faults. The fault recording and analysis process shows if there is any recurring pattern in faults, indicating a design or application problem. Used diplomatically, the records may also indicate shortcomings in crews’ knowledge and a need for training.
Modern plants tend to be both complex and reliable. This means that a maintenance crew often sees a plant in detail for the first time when the first fault occurs. (Ideally, of course, crews should be involved at installation and commissioning stages – but that is another story!) It is impossible to retain the layout of all bar the simplest of systems in the mind, so it is essential to have schematic diagrams readily available.
Equally important, readings at each test point should be documented when the system is working correctly. It is not much use to know pressure at TP3 is 15 bar, the motor draws 75 A or flow to rotary actuator C is 1500 L min–1 under fault conditions, without knowing what the normal readings are.
It can often be difficult to decide what a fault really is; usually the only in- formation is simply ‘the Firkling Machine is not working’. The first diagnostic step is, therefore, to establish what is really wrong – whether there is one fault or several from a common cause. A quick visual and manual check should be made for any obvious aberrations: noise, vibration, heat, leaks, unusual motor current.
From maintenance records it should be possible to see if any recent work has been done or if this is a recurring fault. Recent work is always suspect – particularly if the unit has not been used since the work was done. Some points to check if work has recently been performed are:
• whether the correct units were fitted. Stores departments are not infallible and lookalike units may have been fitted in error. Non-return valves can sometimes be fitted the wrong way round;
• whether all handvalves are correctly open or shut. Many systems are built with standby pumps or compressors with manual changeover. These are (in the author’s experience) a constant source of trouble after a change- over (one invariable characteristic seems to be one less valve handle than there are valves!). Valves can also creep open. Figure 9.6 shows a common fault situation with two hydraulic units, one in use and one on standby. If any of the hand isolation valves V1–V4 are set incorrectly open on the
main or standby units, flow from the duty unit returns direct to tank via
the center position of the standby directional valve and the actuator will not move;
• after electrical work, check the direction of rotation of the pump or compressor. Most only operate in one direction, usually defined with an arrow on the casing, and may even be damaged by prolonged reverse running;
• have any adjustments been ‘twiddled’ or not set correctly after an item has been changed? On many directional valves, for example, the speeds of operation from pilot to main spool can be set by Allen key adjustments. If these are maladjusted, the main spool may not move at all.
If no recent work has been done, and these quick checks do not locate a fault, it is time to start the fault-finding routine of Figure 9.5. One advantage of pneumatic systems is their natural break into distinct portions: (1) a supply portion up to and including the receiver and (2) one or more application portions after the receiver.
The pressure gauge on the receiver allows a natural fault-finding split.
Problems generally fall into three types: a lack of force, low speed (or no speed), or erratic operation. Lack of force or no movement is generally a pressure-related fault. Low speed arises from a flow fault. Erratic operation can arise from sticking valves or from air in a hydraulic system.
Usually pressure monitoring is much easier than flow monitoring but is of- ten misunderstood. A typical example of fault-finding using pressure test points is given in Figure 9.7. Up to time A the system unloads via the solenoid-operated unloading valve V1. When valve V1 energizes, pressure rises to the setting
of the relief valve V2. At time C, directional valve V3 calls for the cylinder to extend. Pressure falls as the cylinder accelerates, until the cylinder is moving at constant speed when P = F/A. At time D, the cylinder reaches the end of travel, and the pressure rises back to the setting of the relief valve. Directional valve V3 de-energizes at E. Note the low pressures in return line test points.
A similar retract stroke takes place during time F to I. The pressure between G and H is lower than between C and D, because friction alone opposes the movement.
The loading valve comes off at time J.
It is important to monitor return line pressure. A fault exists from time X onwards; the return line from the cylinder is blocked, possibly because the spool in the meter-out flow control valve has jammed, allowing no fluid to return. At time Y the directional valve operates causing a rise in pressure on test point TP2 to the setting of the relief valve. Because of the blockage in the return line, point TP3 also rises to a higher pressure because of the lower annulus area on the return side of the piston (P1A = P2a, remember!).
Pressure is therefore a good indication of what is going on in a system, the pressure being the lowest demanded by the loading/unloading valves, the relief valve(s) or the load itself.
Observation of pressure, though, is not the whole story. A pump or actuator can have major internal leakage caused by wear and still function and produce normal pressure readings. The pump on the later Figure 8.10 can deliver 60 l per minute and the normal pressure required to raise the cylinder, measured at T6, is 80 bar. Suppose there is a leak on the seal of the actuator which passes 55 l per minute. The pump will deliver 60 l per minute, 55 l of which will go straight back to the tank via the leaking seal. The remaining 5 l will, however, still cause the cylinder to rise, albeit at a much reduced speed. Because the piston is supporting the load the pressure at T6 will be unchanged at 80 bar. The leak has not changed the observed pressure.
Similarly if, again because of wear, the pump has much reduced efficiency and is only delivering 10 l per minute, it can still develop 80 bar at T6 and cause the cylinder to rise, again at a lower than normal speed.
A hydraulic pump is a positive displacement device (see Chapter 2). This has useful implications when fault-finding. If a pump is working its flow must be getting back to the tank via some route. If it does not the pressure will rise and the oil will eventually go everywhere! Tracking the oil flow route by as simple a method as following warm pipes by hand can sometimes indicate what is wrong.
Remember these basic facts for fault-finding:
• Knowing the delivery rate of the pump is vital and would immediately identify the source of the leaks described above. If there is not a UCC system 20 or similar flow sensor immediately after the pump but before the first relief valve consider installing one as soon as possible.
• Hydraulic pumps are invariably positive displacement pumps. If a pump is delivering fluid it must be going somewhere.
• Acceleration is determined by pressure.
• Force is determined by pressure.
• Velocity (speed) is determined by flow.
• The pressure at any point is determined by the lowest pressure the system can provide under the current conditions.
The interface with the electrical control can cause confusion. The control sequence should be clearly understood. Figure 9.8 shows a typical electrical/ hydraulic scheme used to build a tight pack of objects. An object is placed onto the skid, and its presence noted by a proximity detector connected as an input to a programmable controller (PLC).
When the PLC sees an object, it energizes the loading valve, and causes the cylinder to extend. The cylinder extends until the front limit switch LS j makes (for the first few objects) or the pressure switch PS2 makes (indicating a full stalled pack) or timeout (indicating some form of fault). The cylinder then returns to the back limit LS2 or a timeout (again indicating a fault) when the loading valve is de-energized. The PLC also monitors pump action via pressure switch PS1, which is made whenever the loading valve is energized.
A knowledge of the complete system, both electrical and hydraulic, is required to fault-find on this application. Fault-finding involves checking the sequence by monitoring the state of electrical outputs to solenoids and inputs from limit switches.
All solenoid valves should have an indicator in the plug tops to allow electrical signals to be observed local to the valves. Indicator blocks which fit be- tween plug and valve are available for retro fitting onto systems without this useful feature. It should be remembered, though, that indications purely show electrical voltage is present – it does not, for example, identify an open circuit solenoid coil.
Solenoids can operate on AC (usually 110 V AC) or DC (usually 24 V DC). DC solenoids have totally different operating characteristics. An AC solenoid has a very high inrush current producing a high initial force on the pilot spool. As the spool moves in, the inductance of the coil rises and current falls to a low holding current (and a low force on the pilot spool). If the pilot
spool jams the current remains high, causing the protection fuse or breaker to open or the solenoid coil to burn out if the protection is inadequate. Operation of a 110 volt solenoid system with cold oil is best undertaken with a pocketful of fuses.
The current in a DC solenoid is determined by the coil resistance and does not change with pilot spool position. The solenoid does not, therefore, give the same ‘punch’ to a stiff spool but will not burn out if the spool jams. Current in a DC solenoid also tends to be higher, requiring larger-size cables, particularly if a common return line is used from a block of solenoids.
A useful monitoring device is the through-connector with an integral cur- rent indicator, shown in Figure 9.9. This does give indication of an open circuit coil and combined with the indicator on the plug top can help find most electrical faults.
On most electrically operated valves the pilot spool can be operated manu- ally by pushing the spool directly with a rod (welding rod is ideal!). Electrical signals should, however, be disabled when operating valves manually, as push- ing in the opposite direction to the solenoid can cause the coil to burn out.
Designers of a system can simplify maintenance by building in a fault- finding methodology from the start. This often takes the form of a flowchart. Figure 9.10 shows a typical system, which can be diagnosed by following the flowchart of Figure 9.11. Such charts cannot solve every problem, but can assist with the majority of common faults. If transducers can be fitted to allow the system to be monitored by a computer or programmable controller, Figure 9.11 could form the basis of a computer-based expert system.
Incoming search terms:
- an industrial power system finding the fault
- pneumatic fault finding techniques
- explain the procedures used when fault finding in electro-pneumatic and electro-hydraulic systems
- fault finding instrument in pneumatic system
- fault tracing in maintenance
- faults in an electrohydraulic circuit
- hydraulic fault
- hydraulic fault finding techniques
- Fault finding techniques in pneumatics and hydraulics
- different procedures used when fault finding in electro-pneumatic and electro-hydraulic system
- fault finding in electro-pneumatic
- fault finding in hydraulic circuits
- common faults of pneumatic circuit
- Common faults occur in pneumatic system
- Hydraulics controller Can Fault
- hydraulic system what to do if fault
- hydraulic diagnostic equipmentDiagram
- hydraulic cyclinder fault finding
- hydraulic and pnuematic fault finding
- https://yandex ru/clck/jsredir?from=yandex ru;search;web;;&text=&etext=1832 7BFG8sJL4aBpQK-WoPCXLFaJ8KbELslYd4frnXaxNpDgFQ5PGajCM6BVP9ekIj3uunXRY5aBYrEkUg-z6cZyFQ f047b0c5229769fc6ffe97d8883cff77be920a24&uuid=&state=_BLhILn4SxNIvvL0W45KSic
- flow chart of fault finding in hydrulics
- functional chart hydraulics
- how to find fault in maintenance
- how to fault find in pneumatic circuits
- how to fault find faults on hydraulic circuit
- how to do fault finding on actuator
- functional diagram fault finding
- https://yandex ru/clck/jsredir?from=yandex ru;search;web;;&text=&etext=1826 akO90UpWwIZvqjAx8yLcYBlu34tAv16abZWY9js6mcLA2vCqlzDOcil1uPbKxwPNSr9BPQOmxDlgofpGxWN9YQ 97bb9aee2b43c19c14e9337b35c7c1917775b8bc&uuid=&state=_BLhILn4SxNIvvL0W45KSic
- Hydraulics controller Can Fault FUSE
- hydraulics fault finding
- procedures used when fault finding in electro-pneumatic and electro-hydraulic systems
- troubleshooting of pneumatic system flow chart
- two faults in pnematics systems
- types of fault finding
- unit substitution fault finding do\s and dont;s
- what are the basic requirements when doing of hydraulic fault finding
- what is hydraulic fault finding all about?
- What would cause the following faults on a hydraulic / Pneumatic System and how would you rectify them?
- procedure for fault finding electro-hydraulic systems
- pnueatic cylider fault finding
- importance of fault finding in electricity
- installation fault finding and maintenance of pneumatic circuit
- instrument used in fault finding
- machanic fault tracing chart
- plant maintianamce safety in fault tracing
- plc fault finding circuits with pneumatics
- pneumatic equipment fault
- pneumatic fault finding instrument
- faults of apnuematic system
- fault finding in electro pneumatic and electro hydraulic systems
- fault finding in basic hydraulics
- fault finding electro systems
- fault finding diagram for machine
- Fault finding and maintenance
- fault finding aides in pneumatic systems
- fault diagnosis of hydraulic and pneumatic system
- explain the fault diagonising procedure of hydraulic system
- electro pneumatic fault findings
- electro hydraulic fault finding
- disadvantages of fault finding
- different types of hydraulic circuit in wrm plant
- contoh fault finding
- common faults of pneumatic circuits
- common fault in pneumatic system
- causes of faulty in pneumatic limit switch
- basic principles of fault finding on a hydraulic system
- fault finding in electro pneumatic systems
- fault finding in electro pneumatics
- fault ttacing in hydtaulis dyst
- fault tracing equipments in pump
- fault finding tools hydraulics
- fault finding techniques pneumatic systems
- fault finding techniques hydraulics and pneumatics
- fault finding techniques
- fault finding process in fluid power system
- fault finding procedures on hydraulics and pneumatics
- fault finding procedures electro pneumatic
- fault finding pneumatic systems
- fault finding pneumatic and hydraulic systems
- fault finding on pnaumatic actuators
- fault finding on hydraulic
- fault finding on a positive displacement pump
- fault finding maintenance press
- fault finding in hydraulics
- fault finding in hydraulic systems
- basic fault finding on a hydraulic system